Updated May 2026 · 15 models tracked

Compare AI ModelsSide by Side

Compare AI models side by side — Claude, GPT-4o, Gemini, and more. Real benchmarks, live pricing, and honest pros & cons so you pick the right model, not the most hyped one.

15
Models Tracked
21
Use-Case Guides
21
Head-to-Head Comparisons
2026
Last Updated

Benchmark Comparisons

MMLU, HumanEval, MATH and more — see how every model stacks up on standardized tests.

Transparent Pricing

Up-to-date API pricing per million tokens so you can estimate costs before committing.

Capability Matrix

Context window, multimodal support, max output — every spec in one place.

Use-Case Guides

Not sure which AI to pick? Our guides match you to the right model for your specific needs.

All AI Models

Click any column header to sort. Click a model name for full details.

Advanced compare →
Model TierContext Input / 1M Output / 1MMMLU MultimodalLink
OpenAI o1
OpenAI
frontier200K$15.00$60.0092.3YesTry
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
frontier200K$15.00$75.0091.8YesTry
Grok 4
xAI
frontier256K$3.00$15.0091YesTry
DeepSeek R1
DeepSeek
frontier128K$0.550$2.1990.8NoTry
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
frontier1.0M$1.25$10.0090YesTry
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
frontier200K$3.00$15.0088.7YesTry
GPT-4o
OpenAI
frontier128K$2.50$10.0088.7YesTry
DeepSeek V4 Pro
DeepSeek
frontier128K$0.435$0.87088.5NoTry
Llama 4 Maverick
Meta
frontier1.0M$0.150$0.60087YesTry
Perplexity Pro
Perplexity
frontier127K$3.00$15.0087YesTry
Mistral Large 2
Mistral
frontier128K$2.00$6.0084NoTry
GPT-4o mini
OpenAI
budget128K$0.150$0.60082YesTry
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
budget1.0M$0.300$2.5082YesTry
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Google
budget1.0M$0.100$0.40076YesTry
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
budget200K$0.800$4.0073.8YesTry

Top Frontier Models

View all models →
Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 4.6

frontier

Anthropic's latest and most capable model, excelling at complex reasoning, coding, and nuanced instruction following.

Context
200K
Input / 1M
$3.00
codinganalysiswriting
OpenAI

GPT-4o

frontier

OpenAI's flagship omnimodal model with strong performance across text, vision, and audio tasks.

Context
128K
Input / 1M
$2.50
generalcodingvision
Google

Gemini 2.5 Pro

frontier

Google's most capable model with a 1M token context window, built-in thinking capabilities, and top-tier performance on reasoning, math, and coding benchmarks.

Context
1.0M
Input / 1M
$1.25
complex reasoningresearchlong documents
3 quick questions

Not sure which AI is right for you?

Answer 3 questions — get a personalised recommendation based on your use case, budget, and requirements.

Find my AI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which AI model is the best in 2026?

Claude Sonnet 4.6 and GPT-4o are the top frontier models in 2026. Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads on coding and long-context tasks with a 200K token context window, while GPT-4o excels at multimodal tasks and has the broadest ecosystem integrations.

What is the cheapest AI model available via API?

Gemini 2.0 Flash is the most cost-effective option at $0.10 per million input tokens, followed by GPT-4o mini at $0.15 per million tokens. Both offer strong performance for high-volume tasks.

Which AI has the largest context window?

Gemini 2.5 Pro and Gemini 2.5 Flash both offer a 1 million token context window, allowing them to process entire books or large codebases in a single prompt. Claude Sonnet 4.6 comes next with 200K tokens.

Is Claude better than GPT-4o?

It depends on the task. Claude Sonnet 4.6 outperforms GPT-4o on coding (93.7% vs 90.2% HumanEval) and has a much larger context window. GPT-4o has an edge on multimodal tasks and ecosystem integrations. Both score similarly on MMLU at 88.7%.

Why Use TheBestAIModel.com?

Picking an AI model used to be simple. Now there are fifteen serious options across five providers, pricing shifts every few months, and every company publishes benchmark numbers that conveniently make their model look best. We built this site because we got tired of doing that research ourselves every time something new launched.

We track the frontier models — Claude Sonnet 4.6, GPT-4o, Gemini 2.5 Pro, DeepSeek V4 Pro, Llama 4 Maverick, and more — on the numbers that actually predict performance: HumanEval coding accuracy, MMLU reasoning, MATH benchmarks, context window size, and API pricing per million tokens. Every data point links back to official model cards or provider documentation. When the numbers change, we update them.

If you know which category you need — coding, writing, research, legal work — the use-case guides give you a clear recommendation and the reasoning behind it. If you're choosing between two specific models, the head-to-head comparisons break down who wins where and what the real trade-offs are.

We're not paid by any AI provider to rank their models higher. Some links are affiliate links (see our disclosure), but they don't influence the data or recommendations. The goal is simple: you make a better decision faster.